In regards to email: “Readers Response:: 9/11 Airplane Affidavit By John Lear, Son Of Learjet Inventor” from Alex James forward of email From: Anthony Lawson “Whichever it is, the fact that John Lear flew for the CIA should make your alarm bells ring, for a start….”
>>> From email: July 27, 2014
REPLY to Naconah from Cyrellys:
word from people I’ve spoken with is that this kind of technology does exist and they could do it in broad daylight 20 years ago. Apparently the problem they’ve had with using it for something like a project bluebeam is folks like — identity snip — who would rent a helicopter and take paint guns up to ‘tag’ the theoretical ‘ships’ just to see if they’re real or not. Now with an event like 9-11, nothing sticks around except explosive residue. See my next missive…
>>> From email: July 27, 2014
REPLY to Cyrellys from Naconah:
I’ll get into this later. However, there is something to consider. Spy agencies do not forgive leaks, or those who leak, or those who embarrass them. They fall from grace, are destroyed financially and or are killed. Witness what happened to CIA/DEA operative Barry Seal. They may not do the killing, but know where to go to have it done.
Lear is still walking and talking.
Witnesses in the building and on the ground…they heard explosions, a fireball of that size would leave traces of JP8 and the odor of unburned kerosene about. Most of the fuel exploded outside the building. There is no fuel hot enough to burn through rebar and structural steel unless thermite or cutting demolition high brissance explosive charges or scalar weapons were used.
>>> From email: July 27, 2014
Manticore Group 