Tag Archives: population stabilization

Ebola: Lies, Damn Lies and BS

Quintas Dias.  Ebola Bullshit and more Bullshit

[expletive disclaimer:  every word of it is soundly deserved]

Primary source.  Natural News.  Mike Adams (10-1-14)
This is PART ONE of what will be an ongoing series.
There is much disinformation about Ebola.  Disinformation is erroneous information deliberately construed to deceive and to mislead.  Disinformation is an integral part of psyops and is a military and political weapon.  Public officials and media are an inherent part of disinformation constructs.  Deal with it.  A recent survey of extant literature and discourse regarding Ebola is presented here to clear the air and to present more transparency as to what you can do to avoid contamination and to prevent infection.
1.  Disinfo Claim 1.  Ebola is here in the USA despite claims it could not come to the USA by arrogant and stupid officials.  BS. It is here and likely to spread quickly.
 
2.  Disinfo Claim 2.  This has to do how it is being spread about.  Official claims insist infection only occurs from contact with body fluids: semen, urine, feces, blood, spinal, cerebral fluid and vaginal secretions, saliva.  BS.  Ebola can lay in situ on surfaces in the open air for a considerable amount of time.  It does well in dark and humid interiors.  Surface contact with doorknobs, ATMs, grocery carts, steering wheels, tables, counter tops can transmit the disease.  Touch one of those contaminated surfaces and then touch your face: mouth, nose, skin and you’re done for.
AEROSOL CONTACT.  It is not airborne.  BS.  There is credible evidence that Ebola is now airborne.  That is it can spread via airborne particulates.  This accelerates the infection rate of the disease and makes it far deadlier.
PUBLIC TRANSPO.  Ebola is being spread by public transportation: taxicabs, bicycles and aircraft.  Contaminated surfaces on these conveyances are the culprit and this is killing many Africans and seeing the disease spread.
 
3.  Disinfo Claim 3.  US PUBLIC HEALTH HAS IT ALL UNDER CONTROL.  Major BS.  They cannot control it in Africa.  What makes you think they can do it here, especially with the recent fuckups they’ve made and declarations that they will not implement a track and search of infected carriers associated with the carrier.  WTF?  HELLO?  So infected carriers are being allowed to run around loose in the population.  Moreover, information sources report that many hospitals lack training, PPE, and up to date protocols to deal with it.
The fact that the carrier flew into the US from the African hot zone and walked about for 10 days with the disease underscores the BS coming from the bummer and his lying sons of bitches in the CDC.  The fact that they stated there is to be no efforts to track down likely carriers should tell you they are lying about controlling anything.  Ebola might be up in Alaska right now.
And the American Gestapo, DHS, what about them?  Those guys could not find their own ass with two hands.  If public health has it under control, then why is fedgov suddenly buying hundreds of thousands of PPE units, and notifying morticians to get ready? BS.  Moreover, why is the US border being left wide open?  Why are aircraft from the contagion zone allowed to land, and why are people with West African visas being allowed inside the USA without an examination?  BS.
The BIGGIE.  Obummer just signed an executive order mandating the arrest and mandatory detention in quarantine of any person suspected of carrying an infectious disease.  Wow!  Way to go dudes!  Half the country gonna get pinched for sneezing and coughing now that flu and cold season is on.  Major, major BS.
 
Disinfo Claim 4.  Only a vaccine can cure Ebola.  Right.  The focus is on Big Pharma cures.  Nobody is looking at alternative medicines for a cure or medical herbs.  Nobody is considering the curative powers of Tumeric, Echinacea, Goldenseal, colloidal silver and so on.  Nobody is looking at essential oils.  The FDA is already threatening to arrest anyone making claims contrary to Big Pharma’s vaccines.  Bill Gates and his buds must be anxious that there is a natural cure costing only pennies.  BS.
There are many potent anti viral herbs.  Cinnamon, rosemary and oregano all have curative powers.  Public Health claims that to the contrary this is treason and that you must be a conspiracy nut.
What about boosting your own immune system?  More treason. And you’re an extremist.
What about Vitamin D?  OMG!  The D word, shivers and shudders.  Most of  our foods are sadly deficient in vitamins and this is the most important one in maintaining good health and a viable immune system.
 
Disnfo Claim 5.  Ebola Just Happened!  Right.  Africans are killing health care workers in a rage because they suspect it is an engineered bioweapon.  Bill Gates and George Soros’ hands are all over Ebola.  What’s the connection?  Well, creepy, nerdy Billy is a fervent population reductionist, while murderer and international crookster, Soros is too.  BS.  The plot just thickened.  Oops.
Several researchers point to some interesting if obscure facts about Ebola.  Such as Billy boy and Georgie owning the patents on Ebola and all variations.  WTF?  How is that possible?
Recommendation:  Dudes and ladies will you please get off your dead azz and do your own research … it just might save your azz and mine.  Furthermore, here is a bit of advice and it’s a good one that I learned over some 20 years of involvement with emergency operations.
Q.  “How do you tell if government  officials are lying to you?”
A. “Anytime they open their mouth, theys lying to ya.  And when they attack you for questioning them you know damn well theys lying!
And the bummer man?  Last time I heard he went on vacation again to play golf with Billy Gates and Georgie Boy up in Martha’s Vineyard.
LINKS
Bioweapons
image
Pandemic Preparedness FREE Online How-To Course – B…

Pandemic Preparedness FREE Online How-To Course with the Health Ranger, Mike Adams
Preview by Yahoo
PPE suiting up
image
U.S. government purchase of 160,000 Ebola hazmat suits i…

U.S. government purchase of 160,000 Ebola hazmat suits is proof of expected viral outbreak across North America
Preview by Yahoo
Bummer’s new EO

FDA threatening folks
Preps
Ebola Patents
image
It’s all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid v…

It’s all scripted! Ebola outbreak and impossibly rapid vaccine response clearly scripted; U.S. govt. patented Ebola in 2010 and now owns all victims’ blood
Preview by Yahoo
 
OTHER LINKS

image
The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by govern…

The five biggest lies about Ebola being pushed by government and mass media
Preview by Yahoo

Quintus Dias

I admit it.  I am a PIA (Pain in the Ass)…But my heart is pure!


From Cyrellys to QD  October 1 of 2014.

No need to apologize.  In fact I think when subjected to what looks like an act of war with enough circumstantial evidence to prosecute and possibly convict in a court of law, I don’t think the subjected should mince words.  Mincing words might give the perps the wrong idea.

Ebola Update: faux pas or eugenics, and reliability of testing

By Cyrellys Geibhendach.  Today the question of whether eugenics orientation on the subject of population or over-population is a couth mindset, to be accepted among the efforts to seek cures or treatments for disease.  In this sense, we have to ask ourselves if a murderer or a potential genocidal individual should also be expected to be capable of preserving or saving lives.  Can the two modalities of thinking co-exist?   I posit this is a legitimate question health authorities, academia, and government representatives are FAILING to address.

Is medical science ‘hide-bound’?
Anne McCaffery of Dragonhold Ireland, in her popular science fiction book series Dragon Riders of Pern, makes mention of a peculiar condition that can be found afflicting the thinking of scholars.  She terms it ‘hide-bound’ in which the individual (s) in question are so wrapped up in the texts of the past that they seem incapable of entertaining new ideas or even examining new ideas.  This concept can be stretched to include methodological versions where thinking does not deviate from established methodologies for given problems thus failing to utilize all available methods or tools.
Jon Rappoport raises some excellent questions in his recent observations, and mentioning his prior experience, indicating the possible presence of ‘hide-bound’ type thinking involved in the handling of ebola patients and the testing for the presence of the disease.
In particular he speaks about his concerns involving the non-use of the direct agglutination test  involving the measure of titer.  Most readers are unlikely to be familiar with these terms which can be found in text book Microbiology: An Introduction, by Tortora, Funke, and Case.  Copyright 2002.  The age of the textbook means that most of the researchers involved in microbiology today should be well aware of the measure of titer.  
For the edification of the readership, I will provide reference to the section from the book, titled:  Diagnostic Immunology (pgs 506-516), which section’s objective is to enable the student to “explain how antibodies are used to diagnose diseases”.   There are six subsections involved in methods for testing:  Precipitation Reactions, Agglutination Reactions, Neutralization Reactions, Complement-Fixation Reactions, Fluorescent-Antibody Techniques, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), and then a final brief discussion in the Future of Diagnostic Immunology on certain nonimmunological tests of which PCR and DNA probes are mentioned.  At the time of the writing of this particular book PCR was considered the future of diagnostic immunology and is classed a non-immunological test.
The book says on PCR and DNA probes (page 516):
The use of certain nonimmunological tests such as te PCR and DNA probes that were discussed in Chapter 10, is increasing.  Some of these tests will become automated to a significant degree.  Fore example, a DNA chip containing over 50,000 DNA probes for genetic information expected is possible pathogens can be exposed to a test sample.  This chip is scanned and its data automatically analyzed.  PCR tests are also becoming highly automated….(snip)….At present, detecting and identifying such pathogens usually require that the microorganism be selectively isolated and cultivated before diagnostic tests can be applied.  This time-consuming process poses significant problems when the source of the infection is a perishable consumer product (or consumer?  added by Cy).  Much current research in diagnostic methods is now aimed at enabling health workers to detect and identify pathogenic organisms directly, and quickly in a food sample without the need for isolation and cultivation.
So has accuracy been sacrificed for speed and convenience?
The measure of titer belongs to the Direct Agglutination Tests family.   These tests “detect antibodies against relatively large cellular antigens, such as those on red blood cells, bacteria, and fungi. ”  This type of test is one involving the time consuming process mentioned above of isolation and cultivation.  “…now they (this type of test) are usually done in plastic microtiter plates, which have many shallow wells that take the place of the individual test tubes.  The amount of particulate antigen in each well is the same, but the amount of serum containing antibodies is diluted so that each successive well has half the antibodies of the previous well.  These tests are used for example, to test for brucellosis and to separate Salmonella isolates into serovars, types defined by serological means.
     Clearly the more antibody we start with, the more dilutions it will take to lower the amount to the point where there is not enough antibody for the antigen to react with.  This is the measure of titer, or concentration of serum antibody (Figure 18.5).  For infectious diseases in general, the higher the serum antibody titer, the greater the immunity to the disease.  However, the titer alone is of limited use in diagnosing an existing illness.  There is no way to know whether the measured antibodies were generated in response to the immediate infection or to an earlier illness.  For diagnostic purposes, a rise in titer is significant; that is, the titer is higher later in the course of the disease than at the outset.  Also if it can be demonstrated that the person’s blood had no antibody titer before the illness but has a significant titer while the disease is progressing, this change, called seroconversion, is also diagnostic.  This situation is frequently encountered with HIV infections.
     Some diagnostic tests specifically identify IgM antibodies.  As discussed in Chapter 17, short-lived IgM is more likely to reflect a response to a current disease condition.”  End quote.
So are the methods being used an example of hide-bound thinking or a limitation in time (i.e. a fast killing virus) or some other reason, like a microorganism that cannot be cultured by conventional methods?  This later possibility is given by the book as the purpose for using the techniques called “the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)“.
Quote page 295, Chapter 10 titled A Survey of the Microbial World; section The Polymerase Chain Reaction:
“the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be used to increase the amount of microbial DNA to levels that can be tested by gel electrophoresis (see Chapter 9 page 254).
     …(snip) In recent years, PCR has been used successfully in several discoveries that were not otherwise possible…”  and the section goes on to cite historical examples involving the amplification of DNA coding for sequences in historical examples of organisms.
in the prior section it mentions, “DNA in soil or water sample can be amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using an rRNA primer (see below).  The rRNA gene can be sequenced to determine evolutionary relationships between organisms, especially microorganisms.”
This is essentially putting a fingerprinting method to comparative use.  The benefit is speed.  It may well be debatable as to which method measuring titor or PCR is better or if both should be employed.  I would like to know more before assuming a stance in the debate.  For example what is the rate of culture period for the measure of titor with regards to ebola, vs the use of PCR.  Does the time it takes to process titor exceed or allow the survivability of an infected patient?  Forgive me if I missed it, but I didn’t see that information given in the argument anywhere.  Are there other benefits or advantages involved here that explain why they are favoring PCR and other methods do not seem involved?
And what about the academic enculturation of over-population theory and its associative politics?  The suspicion involving neglect on the part of the microbiology medical personnel is very much based on a well known presence of of this sub-culture in academia and the students it produces.
I my personal perusal of this argument it is not that the issue presented is at this point correct or incorrect, but that as far as I am concerned, I think the argument presented is incomplete.  I’d like to see it fleshed out more to determine if it is conclusive or not.  And I’d like to see a rebuttal from the currently practicing microbiology community regarding the concern.  It is in my view interesting, but not quite enough to take either side in the debate.
FiOs.
Cyrellys
more on ebola outbreak 2014 at Manticore Group

FW: Why does the US Government have an ‘Office of Population Affairs’?

A forward of a very well written piece on the population control issue that may be related to the Ebola Outbreak 2014 if the virus is a bioweapon attack as mentioned by the State Department in a recent briefing. Cy

Why Does The U.S. Government Have An ‘Office Of Population Affairs’?

by Michael Snyder

 URL:http://wp.me/p3c1Bb-8Wz

Population Control - Public Domain

Did you know that the federal government has an “Office of Population Affairs”?  I didn’t realize this either until someone sent me a link to their website.  The Office of Population Affairs operates under the umbrella of the Department of Health & Human Services, and it might as well be called “The Office of Population Control” because almost everything on the website is about controlling or reducing the size of the population.  On the site you can findinformation and resources about abortion, female sterilization, male sterilization and a vast array of contraceptive choices.  There is even a search engine where you can find a local “family planning clinic” where you can get rid of any “unintended pregnancy” that may be bothering you.  Frankly, it sickens me to think that my tax dollars are being used to fund all of this.

But the Office of Population Affairs is not just pro-abortion and pro-sterilization.  On the page describing their “purpose and mission”, they actually admit that “population research” and studying “population growth” are part of their core work.  The following is an excerpt from the official OPA website

**********

Title X is the only federal program dedicated solely to the provision of family planning and related preventive services. The Office of Population Affairs (OPA) administers the Title X program and serves as the focal point to advise the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary for Health on a wide range of reproductive health topics, including family planning, adolescent pregnancy, sterilization andother population issues.

The Office of Population Affairs operates under the direction of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs.

Family Planning Mission
To assist individuals in determining the number and spacing of their children through the provision of voluntary, confidential and low-cost education, counseling, and related comprehensive medical services to eligible clients:

  • To assist in making comprehensive, voluntary family planning services available to all persons desiring such services;
  • To coordinate domestic population and family planning research with the present and future needs of family planning programs;
  • To enable public and nonprofit private entities to plan and develop comprehensive programs of family planning services;
  • To develop and make readily available information, including educational materials, on family planning and population growth to all persons desiring such information;
  • To evaluate and improve the effectiveness of family planning service programs and population research; and
  • To assist in training staff to effectively carry out family planning services

**********

And needless to say, the goal is never to increase the size of the population.

At least in the old days these population control advocates were more honest about what they were trying to do.  For example, Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger once made the following statement

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Sadly, this sick and twisted philosophy is not just limited to one specific department of the federal government.

The truth is that this worldview is represented at the highest levels in the White House itself.  Barack Obama repeatedly mentions how much he depends on the advice of his top science adviser John P. Holdren.  Well, as many of you probably already know, Holdren is an enthusiastic proponent of extreme population control measures.

The following is what one writer discovered when he investigated Holdren’s writings…

He offered that “a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources … The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits … The Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

Holdren, et al, believe this global body possesses “ample authority under which population growth could be regulated.” Hiding behind the passive voice, they wrote, “it has been concluded”—by whom?—”that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” (Emphasis added.) They added that if parents were guilty of “overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility.”

To further reduce the West’s population and carbon footprint, the “de-development of overdeveloped countries…should be given top priority.”

Holdren further, repeatedly, proposed the United Statestransfer $1.43 trillion to $2.86 trillion of U.S. GNP to Third-World countries every year for several decades.

Isn’t that disturbing?

This is the guy telling Obama what he should believe about scientific matters.

In a previous article, I included this gem from Holdren…

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limitednumber of births.

But to be fair, this is not the first president that has had a nutjob like this as his top science adviser.  George W. Bush actually employed Paul Ehrlich, the author of “The Population Bomb”, as his top science official.  In many ways, Ehrlich is even more extreme than Holdren is.  Here are a couple of quotes from Ehrlich

“To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied”

**********

“Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins”

Remember, these are not just two nutty professors from the lunatic fringe.  These are highly respected members of the scientific community that are personally advising our presidents.

And the leading contender to become the next president is also surrounded by these types of people.

For example, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton named Nina Fedoroff once made the following statement

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

It is not politically expedient for our politicians to come right out and proclaim that they are for population control while they are on the campaign trail.

But if you look at their actions and at the people that they surround themselves with, the message is exceedingly clear.

So what do you think about all of this?  Please feel free to share your thoughts by posting a comment below…

Michael Snyder is the Editor of the End of the American Dream blog.

The-Population-Control-Agenda-Of-The-Radical-Humanists-Who-Would-Love-For-You-And-I-To-DieImage Credit: Fourwinds10.com

Laura J Alcorn, National Director

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 
Send these post to your email groups and friends.
Like us on
 Facebook and follow us on 
twitter

Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network