Tag Archives: Ron Paul

Washington State namesake of our nation’s first President flushes US Constitution

Cyrellys Geibhendach.  America is a Constitutional Republic NOT a democracy.  Many people forget there is a distinct difference.  A Constitutional Republic places restrictions upon democracy that is reasonable.  A nation founded upon Constitutional principles enshrined within the founding document which defined the conditions upon which our nations states agreed to become a union, risks voiding the contract between the States when it violates the contents and intent of its national Constitution, just as it does when the national structure violates or disregards the constitutions of any individual state.

 

On December 11 of 2014, the Seattle Times not only reported that the State of Washington flushed an integral chunk of our nation’s contract, the 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution, but it also described in its editorial statement how it itself approved of the flushing in an incredible example of absolute Statism.   Statism is the belief that the state should control either economic or social policy, or both, to some degree.   It is one of the foundations of Communism.  To promote or uphold statism is the definition of being a statist, which is a very ugly term when living within a Constitutional Republic.

 

The Seattle Times repeatedly referred to the arguments opposing I-594 as smoke screens.  “They also saw through the smoke screen from I-594’s opponents, who claimed the measure would criminalize such transfers as intrafamily gifts.”

 

In true communist fashion it described the legislation as, “Instead, I-594 represents a restatement of the compact gun owners have with society: The fundamental right to keep and bear arms is not absolute.”

 

Since when is the US Constitution and the rights it recognizes, negotiable by the States?  It isn’t, without breaking the contract.  A “restatement of the compact” cannot be done without a formal alteration of the US Constitution.  That would require a Constitutional Convention of the States of the Union.  So when did Washington State host a Constitutional Convention?  Funny but it seems none of the other states agreed to such a Convention, nor were they invited to Washington State’s shin-dig.

 

Washington state took it upon itself to nullify the US Constitution and create in the whole of the nation a Constitutional Crisis…not that one didn’t already exist with Obama violating it every time he turns around.  The man is re-inventing the direct-offense-wheel, once referred to by grade schoolers as ‘go sit and spin‘.

 

Secretary of State John F. Kerry told Congress Tuesday that President Obama wants expansive war powers to pursue the Islamic State terrorists wherever and however he deems necessary, stunning lawmakers by requesting a war authorization that would even allow the Pentagon to commit American combat troops to the fight.  ~  Obama Stuns Congress By Demanding Expanded Powers To Declare War | NTEB Newsdesk

 

That’s the same John Kerry who along with Senator McCain made trips to the Ukraine which resulted in US sponsored regime change which they later blamed on Russia.  And as we know from prior dialogs posted to this site, the general research consensus is that not only is Obama a sock puppet of colossal proportions, but both Kerry and McCain are well known deep state actors for the US Shadow Government as it moves out into the open supplanting elected surface government.  Ref. Catherine Austin Fitts.  Ron Paul in his recent address on the Congressional Resolution defaming Russia, which can and probably will be seen in the international relations venue as a total fiasco at least or an act of war at worst, mentioned the money that was spent on regime change in Russia.

 

One might wonder if the statists who are also generally-speaking supporters of the NWO pursuit of ‘no borders’ or ‘open borders’ and global government which current incarnation is for the corporations and transnational central banks by the corporations and transnational central banks rather than for or of any flesh and blood people; one might wonder if they deliberately devised this little bit of irony as a ‘back-in-your-face’ of the Celtic roots of the Pacific Northwest?  Would it be far from imagining they would strive to impinge upon Celtic Virtues and the celtic contribution of Nature’s God and natural rights by stripping the US Constitution down to its skivvies right in the heart of Celt Country?  This Old Irish American didn’t find it amusing.  There is no part of our natural rights and obligations as citizens according to the Constitution that is negotiable.  What part of “shall not be infringed,” didn’t make sense to Washington State or the Seattle Times?  My father once said, that anyone who doesn’t like this nation as it is should pack up their bucket of rocks and ship out to some other country and try their luck there.

 

Well it gets better yet.  Not only are the Statists laying their grubby hands on our liberties and rights, but the bureaucratic terrorists are also moving on violating our health with allowing their compadre’s their depopulation meme’s via an intent to release GM modified mosquitoes.    ZOONOTIC AND OR INSECT BORN DISEASES’ ARE THE PERFECT CARRIERS FOR PROPAGATING BIOLOGIC WARFARE AGENTS RELEASED WITH GM MODIFIED INSECTS!  We already have a variety of mosquito born diseases plaguing us such as West Nile Virus.  These right on the heels of Ebola which btw hasn’t actually ceased…it’s just not being reported by the media which these days has an attention span shorter than a three year old.  What a way to spread something like Ebola and goodness knows what else, far beyond any ability to contain?

 

It might be easy to swallow a suggestion of coincidink if it weren’t for having patterns traceable to a disturbing number of these various actors illustrating an effort to emminitize the eschaton (Book of Revelations or a parallel track).

 

NOTE:  Emminetizing the Eschaton is about creating the circumstances of Revelations final war and all that goes with it.  It is the cover for global depopulation by the Eugenics crowd.  —name withheld—- has been involved in the academic theology-building to justify or establish a public-usable version of content supporting an Eschaton.  He was making statements in dialogs with a —- name withheld —— and other associates on his blog at ——- at this time, about the Eschaton.  He’s a theoretical physicist and philosophical heretic with a reach that extends not only into the exotic end of academia but also into the environmental movement and evangelical christian community while ————– mentioned above has had visits to the Vatican.  Ref. email 12/08/2014 synopsis on the Ukraine/Russia crisis – forward, backward, and beneath the table.

 

When all the pieces of the puzzle are laid out on the table, we find a sleeping populace who is seemingly oblivious to the proverbial freight trains bearing down on them from opposition directions.  It isn’t the journey or the speed that hurts, it’s the sudden meeting of the minds where X marks the spot.  It reminds me of another one of those long ago wisdoms once applied to errant children, “you’re an accident looking for a place to happen.”

Cyrellys, I am ROAR.

 


 

Other wild and woolly news:

 

http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/retirement/deal-reached-to-allow-pension-plans-to-cut-benefits/ar-BBgAimc?ocid=iehp

Russian Missiles Shoot Down Ukrainian Surveillance Drones Over Crimea

US military converting transport planes to carry wave of infected Ebola victims to the United States

CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR JERRY ‘MOONBEAM’ BROWN SIGNS LAW FORCING STUDENTS TO LEARN ‘GAY HISTORY’ IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS!

World facing Armageddon unless Obama and Putin ‘defrost’ icy relationship: Gorbachev warns new Cold War could last for years

Elite Think Tank Admits to Ongoing Climate Engineering Experiments

 

 

 

 

Ron Paul: Reckless Congress ‘Declares War’ on Russia

Ron Paul vs Congressional Resolution on Russia
Too few listened then. Will they listen now? Image source: http://www.zerohedge.com

Ron Paul.  December 6th 2014.  Today the US House passed what I consider to be one of the worst pieces of legislation ever. H. Res. 758 was billed as a resolution “strongly condemning the actions of the Russian Federation, under President Vladimir Putin, which has carried out a policy of aggression against neighboring countries aimed at political and economic domination.”

In fact, the bill was 16 pages of war propaganda that should have made even neocons blush, if they were capable of such a thing.

These are the kinds of resolutions I have always watched closely in Congress, as what are billed as “harmless” statements of opinion often lead to sanctions and war. I remember in 1998 arguing strongly against the Iraq Liberation Act because, as I said at the time, I knew it would lead to war. I did not oppose the Act because I was an admirer of Saddam Hussein – just as now I am not an admirer of Putin or any foreign political leader – but rather because I knew then that another war against Iraq would not solve the problems and would probably make things worse. We all know what happened next.

That is why I can hardly believe they are getting away with it again, and this time with even higher stakes: provoking a war with Russia that could result in total destruction!

If anyone thinks I am exaggerating about how bad this resolution really is, let me just offer a few examples from the legislation itself:

The resolution (paragraph 3) accuses Russia of an invasion of Ukraine and condemns Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty. The statement is offered without any proof of such a thing. Surely with our sophisticated satellites that can read a license plate from space we should have video and pictures of this Russian invasion. None have been offered. As to Russia’s violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, why isn’t it a violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty for the US to participate in the overthrow of that country’s elected government as it did in February? We have all heard the tapes of State Department officials plotting with the US Ambassador in Ukraine to overthrow the government. We heard US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland bragging that the US spent $5 billion on regime change in Ukraine. Why is that OK?

The resolution (paragraph 11) accuses the people in east Ukraine of holding “fraudulent and illegal elections” in November. Why is it that every time elections do not produce the results desired by the US government they are called “illegal” and “fraudulent”? Aren’t the people of eastern Ukraine allowed self-determination? Isn’t that a basic human right?

The resolution (paragraph 13) demands a withdrawal of Russia forces from Ukraine even though the US government has provided no evidence the Russian army was ever in Ukraine. This paragraph also urges the government in Kiev to resume military operations against the eastern regions seeking independence.

The resolution (paragraph 14) states with certainty that the Malaysia Airlines flight 17 that crashed in Ukraine was brought down by a missile “fired by Russian-backed separatist forces in eastern Ukraine.” This is simply incorrect, as the final report on the investigation of this tragedy will not even be released until next year and the preliminary report did not state that a missile brought down the plane. Neither did the preliminary report – conducted with the participation of all countries involved – assign blame to any side.

Paragraph 16 of the resolution condemns Russia for selling arms to the Assad government in Syria. It does not mention, of course, that those weapons are going to fight ISIS – which we claim is the enemy — while the US weapons supplied to the rebels in Syria have actually found their way into the hands of ISIS!

Paragraph 17 of the resolution condemns Russia for what the US claims are economic sanctions (“coercive economic measures”) against Ukraine. This even though the US has repeatedly hit Russia with economic sanctions and is considering even more!

The resolution (paragraph 22) states that Russia invaded the Republic of Georgia in 2008. This is simply untrue. Even the European Union – no friend of Russia – concluded in its investigation of the events in 2008 that it was Georgia that “started an unjustified war” against Russia not the other way around! How does Congress get away with such blatant falsehoods? Do Members not even bother to read these resolutions before voting?

In paragraph 34 the resolution begins to even become comical, condemning the Russians for what it claims are attacks on computer networks of the United States and “illicitly acquiring information” about the US government. In the aftermath of the Snowden revelations about the level of US spying on the rest of the world, how can the US claim the moral authority to condemn such actions in others?

Chillingly, the resolution singles out Russian state-funded media outlets for attack, claiming that they “distort public opinion.” The US government, of course, spends billions of dollars worldwide to finance and sponsor media outlets including Voice of America and RFE/RL, as well as to subsidize “independent” media in countless counties overseas. How long before alternative information sources like RT are banned in the United States? This legislation brings us closer to that unhappy day when the government decides the kind of programming we can and cannot consume – and calls such a violation “freedom.”

The resolution gives the green light (paragraph 45) to Ukrainian President Poroshenko to re-start his military assault on the independence-seeking eastern provinces, urging the “disarming of separatist and paramilitary forces in eastern Ukraine.” Such a move will mean many more thousands of dead civilians.

To that end, the resolution directly involves the US government in the conflict by calling on the US president to “provide the government of Ukraine with lethal and non-lethal defense articles, services, and training required to effectively defend its territory and sovereignty.” This means US weapons in the hands of US-trained military forces engaged in a hot war on the border with Russia. Does that sound at all like a good idea?

There are too many more ridiculous and horrific statements in this legislation to completely discuss. Probably the single most troubling part of this resolution, however, is the statement that “military intervention” by the Russian Federation in Ukraine “poses a threat to international peace and security.” Such terminology is not an accident: this phrase is the poison pill planted in this legislation from which future, more aggressive resolutions will follow. After all, if we accept that Russia is posing a “threat” to international peace how can such a thing be ignored? These are the slippery slopes that lead to war.

This dangerous legislation passed today, December 4, with only ten (!) votes against! Only ten legislators are concerned over the use of blatant propaganda and falsehoods to push such reckless saber-rattling toward Russia.

Here are the Members who voted “NO” on this legislation. If you do not see your own Representative on this list call and ask why they are voting to bring us closer to war with Russia! If you do see your Representative on the below list, call and thank him or her for standing up to the warmongers.

Voting “NO” on H. Res. 758:

1) Justin Amash (R-MI)
2) John Duncan (R-TN)
3) Alan Grayson, (D-FL)
4) Alcee Hastings (D-FL)
5) Walter Jones (R-NC)
6) Thomas Massie (R-KY)
7) Jim McDermott (D-WA)
8 George Miller (D-CA)
9) Beto O’Rourke (D-TX)
10 Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA)

See more by former Congressman Dr. Ron Paul at his Facebook page where this article first appeared, and at his other projects RonPaulInstitute.org, VoicesofLiberty.com.

This article was also presented to the public at:  Activist Post